Home News Baba Ijesha inserted car key in my private part, asked me not...

Baba Ijesha inserted car key in my private part, asked me not to tell anyone – Minor tells court

3
A child forensic expert, Mrs Anike Ajayi-Kayode, who is the Executive Director of the Cece Yara Foundation, informed the court that the case of Omiyinka was referred to her by the Special Criminal Investigation Department (SCID) of the Lagos State Command, Nigerian Police Force forensic Investigation. Ajayi-Kayode who was led in evidence by the Director of Public Prosecution DPP, Mrs Olayinka Adeyemi, said the outcome of her forensic Investigation revealed that “the perpetrator engaged the child ìn sexual activities twice when she was seven years old.” The witness who is a certified child forensic interview specialist told the court that she had participated in over 25 child forensic interviews. She said that the survivor was relaxed, cooperative and was able to recall events that happened ìn the past. The witness also said that the perpetrator reminded his victim that he touched her some years back and that she has grown up and developed. She said he asked her: “Do you have a boyfriend? We have unfinished business. Ajayi-Kayode said that the child told her that on the first occasion, her aggressor told her to “remove her pant, sit her on his lap and rub his manhood on her body” and instructed her not to tell anybody. She said the child told her that on the second occasion which was on April 19, the perpetrator “inserted his car keys into her Virginia” and also told her not to tell anybody. The child expert told the court that the attributes exhibited by the defendant were the dynamics of child sexual abusers and the modus operandi of perpetrators which involves”secrecy, intimidation, threat or coercion”. She said the defendant’s attributes were also “similar to that exhibited by child abusers all over the world” due to the vulnerability of their victims. The child expert said after interviewing the child, she conducted a forensic investigation on her and wrote a report on her findings adding that this has been compressed into a flash drive. Thereafter, the prosecution sought the court’s permission to tender the flash drive and the report before the court. The defence did not object to the request. The court admitted in evidence the flash drive and Child forensic interview report prepared by the witness and the items were marked exhibit H and H1. Also marked exhibit G was the clinical presentation on the interview conducted with the survivor. Earlier, there was a mild drama ìn court as Egbeyemi made attempt to seek adjournment on the matter. Egbeyemi, at the resumed proceeding, told the court he had a letter from Mr Babatunde Ogala SAN and Dada Awosika SAN requesting for an adjournment. He said Ogala was indisposed while Awosika had travelled out of the country. But the prosecution opposed the application for adjournment by the defence. Adeyemi reminded the court that the case against the defendant was a criminal matter which takes precedence over any other matter. She argued that it is not fashionable for the defence to bẹ asking for an adjournment for the senior lawyers adding that since he was ìn court to hold brief for them, he should bẹ ìn possession with the facts of the case. Citing several authorities, the prosecution urged the court to hold that the defence counsel has facts of the case and order proceeding into the matter. She also urged the court to hold that no party can hold the court to ransom and seek adjournment at his whims and caprices. However, Justice Oluwatoyin Taiwo asked the court registrar to clarify when messages were sent to counsels on dates fixed for hearing. He said text messages were sent on August 29 and September 26 and that the senior lawyers replied that the dates were okay for them for trial. Justice Taiwo rejected their application for adjournment following which the prosecution presented its first witness. The matter was adjourned to October 20 and 21 for cross-examination of the forensic expert by the defence. BabaIjesha was arraigned on June 24. He is standing trial on six counts bordering on defilement of a minor.

A child forensic expert, Mrs Anike Ajayi-Kayode, who is the Executive Director of the Cece Yara Foundation, informed the court that the case of Omiyinka was referred to her by the Special Criminal Investigation Department (SCID) of the Lagos State Command, Nigerian Police Force forensic Investigation.

Ajayi-Kayode who was led in evidence by the Director of Public Prosecution DPP, Mrs Olayinka Adeyemi, said the outcome of her forensic Investigation revealed that “the perpetrator engaged the child ìn s*xual activities twice when she was seven years old.”

The witness who is a certified child forensic interview specialist told the court that she had participated in over 25 child forensic interviews.

She said that the survivor was relaxed, cooperative and was able to recall events that happened ìn the past.

The witness also said that the perpetrator reminded his victim that he touched her some years back and that she has grown up and developed.

READ ALSO:   Ghanaian fraudster Tourey Ahmed Rufai extradited to the U.S.

She said he asked her: “Do you have a boyfriend? We have unfinished business.

Ajayi-Kayode said that the child told her that on the first occasion, her aggressor told her to “remove her pant, sit her on his lap and rub his manhood on her body” and instructed her not to tell anybody.

She said the child told her that on the second occasion which was on April 19, the perpetrator “inserted his car keys into her Virginia” and also told her not to tell anybody.

The child expert told the court that the attributes exhibited by the defendant were the dynamics of child sexual abusers and the modus operandi of perpetrators which involves”secrecy, intimidation, threat or coercion”.

She said the defendant’s attributes were also “similar to that exhibited by child abusers all over the world” due to the vulnerability of their victims.

READ ALSO:   Osun residents flee as family of seven dies mysteriously

The child expert said after interviewing the child, she conducted a forensic investigation on her and wrote a report on her findings adding that this has been compressed into a flash drive.

Thereafter, the prosecution sought the court’s permission to tender the flash drive and the report before the court.

The defence did not object to the request.

The court admitted in evidence the flash drive and Child forensic interview report prepared by the witness and the items were marked exhibit H and H1.

Also marked exhibit G was the clinical presentation on the interview conducted with the survivor.

He is standing trial on six counts bordering on defilement of a minor.

Follow Us on Facebook – @LadunLiadi; Instagram – @LadunLiadi; Twitter – @LadunLiadi; Youtube – @LadunLiadiTV for updates

3 COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here